ElendiLabs Logo
Back to Articles

Local Regulatory Experts

Connect with regulatory affairs consultancies specializing in this region.

Qualtech Consulting Corporation

Taiwan, China, Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, Germany, Korea, Thailand, USA

Registration

A specialized medical device consulting firm offering a one-stop solution for complex global regulatory challenges. We offer real-time regulatory and clinical support, local representation, and QMS services across 13 markets, ensuring efficient market entry and compliance.

Registrar Corp

Hampton, Virginia (HQ), Shenzhen, China, London, United Kingdom, Paris, France, Madrid, Spain, Hyderabad, India, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tel Aviv, Israel, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Cape Town, South Africa

Registration

A global FDA compliance firm assisting businesses in the food, medical device, drug, and cosmetic industries with registration, U.S. Agent services, labeling, and regulatory software solutions.

MedEnvoy Global

The Hague, Netherlands, London, United Kingdom, United States, Switzerland, Australia

Registration

A global regulatory compliance partner specializing in in-country representation (EC Rep, UKRP, CH Rep, US Agent) and independent importer services for medical device and IVD manufacturers. We help companies navigate complex regulations in Europe, the UK, Switzerland, and the US while maintaining supply chain flexibility.

ARQon Pte. Ltd.

Singapore (HQ), Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Switzerland, USA, Australia, New Zealand, Rwanda, India, Sri Lanka

Registration

We are a premier regulatory consultancy firm specializing in medical devices, in-vitro diagnostics (IVD), and pharmaceuticals. Founded in 2014, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services ranging from product development strategy and clinical trials to product registration and post-market surveillance. With a team of experts possessing vast experience in regulatory authorities and industry, we bridge the gap between scientific innovation and regulatory compliance, ensuring patient safety while fostering medical advancement. The company also provides unique business matching services through its ATTOPOLIS platform and training through the International Medical Device School.

View More Consultancies in This Region
Registration

February 2, 2025

Approximately 5 minutes

US FDA Medical Device Classification: Risk-Based System and Pathways for Novel Devices

US FDA Medical Device Classification: Risk-Based System

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies medical devices into one of three classes (Class I, II, or III) based on the increasing risk they pose to the patient or user. Unlike the rules-based systems used in Europe, the FDA uses a predicate-based system where classification is often determined by finding a legally marketed device that is Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the new product.


🏥 The Three Device Classes

ClassRisk LevelRequired ControlsPremarket SubmissionExample
Class ILow RiskGeneral ControlsUsually ExemptAdhesive Bandages
Class IIMedium RiskSpecial Controls510(k) Notification (often)Endoscopes, Powered Wheelchairs
Class IIIHigh RiskGeneral + Special ControlsPremarket Approval (PMA)Pacemakers, Heart Valves

1. Class I (Low Risk) These devices are typically simple in design, such as scalpels and manual stethoscopes. Compliance is primarily ensured through General Controls (e.g., proper manufacturing, labeling, and facility registration). Most Class I devices are exempt from premarket clearance.

2. Class II (Medium Risk) These devices are more complex, but their failure is unlikely to cause serious injury immediately. Special Controls (e.g., performance standards, post-market surveillance) are required in addition to General Controls. Many Class II devices require a 510(k) Pre-market Notification to demonstrate Substantial Equivalence to a predicate device.

3. Class III (High Risk) These devices support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing health impairment, or pose a potentially unreasonable risk of illness or injury. They require the most rigorous review: Premarket Approval (PMA), which demands extensive scientific data, including clinical trial results, to prove safety and efficacy.


🔎 Classifying Novel Devices (De Novo and 513(g))

Determining Classification Most devices can be classified by searching the FDA classification database for a Substantially Equivalent predicate device. This search reveals the device's classification, the three-letter Product Code, and the specific regulation number.

513(g) Request for Information If no clear predicate device can be identified, manufacturers can submit a 513(g) Request for Information to the FDA. The agency will evaluate the information and issue a ruling on the device's classification within 60 days. This submission does not grant market approval.

De Novo Classification Request Devices that are entirely new and have no existing classification are automatically considered Class III. If the manufacturer believes the device is not high risk, they may file a De Novo classification request to reclassify it as Class I or Class II. Upon successful De Novo approval, the device can be marketed immediately and serves as a new predicate for future devices.

Need Expert Guidance?

Contact us at contact@elendilabs.com / +852 4416 5550