ElendiLabs Logo
Back to Articles

Local Regulatory Experts

Connect with regulatory affairs consultancies specializing in this region.

Qualtech Consulting Corporation

Taiwan, China, Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, Germany, Korea, Thailand, USA

Registration

A specialized medical device consulting firm offering a one-stop solution for complex global regulatory challenges. We offer real-time regulatory and clinical support, local representation, and QMS services across 13 markets, ensuring efficient market entry and compliance.

Registrar Corp

Hampton, Virginia (HQ), Shenzhen, China, London, United Kingdom, Paris, France, Madrid, Spain, Hyderabad, India, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tel Aviv, Israel, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Cape Town, South Africa

Registration

A global FDA compliance firm assisting businesses in the food, medical device, drug, and cosmetic industries with registration, U.S. Agent services, labeling, and regulatory software solutions.

MedEnvoy Global

The Hague, Netherlands, London, United Kingdom, United States, Switzerland, Australia

Registration

A global regulatory compliance partner specializing in in-country representation (EC Rep, UKRP, CH Rep, US Agent) and independent importer services for medical device and IVD manufacturers. We help companies navigate complex regulations in Europe, the UK, Switzerland, and the US while maintaining supply chain flexibility.

ARQon Pte. Ltd.

Singapore (HQ), Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Switzerland, USA, Australia, New Zealand, Rwanda, India, Sri Lanka

Registration

We are a premier regulatory consultancy firm specializing in medical devices, in-vitro diagnostics (IVD), and pharmaceuticals. Founded in 2014, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services ranging from product development strategy and clinical trials to product registration and post-market surveillance. With a team of experts possessing vast experience in regulatory authorities and industry, we bridge the gap between scientific innovation and regulatory compliance, ensuring patient safety while fostering medical advancement. The company also provides unique business matching services through its ATTOPOLIS platform and training through the International Medical Device School.

View More Consultancies in This Region
Other

July 20, 2025

Approximately 5 minutes

Decoding FDA NDA Classification Codes: A Strategic Guide for Regulatory Affairs

Decoding FDA NDA Classification Codes: A Strategic Guide for Regulatory Affairs

In the complex landscape of U.S. drug regulation, the New Drug Application (NDA) is the vehicle through which drug sponsors formally propose that the FDA approve a new pharmaceutical for sale and marketing. However, not all NDAs are created equal. The FDA uses a numerical classification system (Types 1 through 10) to define the nature of the drug and the specific regulatory hurdles it must clear.

The 10 NDA Classification Types

Understanding these codes is critical for determining data requirements, patent strategies, and review timelines.

High Innovation & New Ingredients

  • Type 1 – New Molecular Entity (NME): The 'gold standard' of innovation. It contains an active moiety never before approved in the US. These require the most extensive nonclinical, clinical, and CMC (Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls) data.
  • Type 2 – New Active Ingredient: Contains a new active ingredient, but may involve a previously approved moiety. While not a full NME, it still demands substantial clinical evidence.

Modifications of Approved Drugs

  • Type 3 – New Dosage Form: The same drug substance but in a different form (e.g., converting a tablet to an injectable). The focus here is on bioavailability and bioequivalence.
  • Type 4 – New Combination: A Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) of two or more previously approved drugs. Sponsors must prove clinical added value, such as increased convenience or efficacy.
  • Type 5 – New Formulation or Other Differences: Includes new strengths, routes of administration, or even a new manufacturer. These often utilize the 505(b)(2) pathway, relying partly on existing safety data.

Indications and Market Shifts

  • Type 6 – New Indication (Same Applicant): Seeking approval for a new therapeutic use for an already approved drug.
  • Type 7 – Previously Marketed Without Approved NDA: Applies to older 'grandfathered' drugs marketed before modern FDA requirements. The FDA evaluates these retrospectively.
  • Type 8 – Rx to OTC Switch: Moving a prescription drug to Over-the-Counter status. The regulatory focus shifts toward consumer labeling and self-use safety.

Specialized Indication Strategies

  • Type 9 – New Indication (Not Marketed Separately): The drug is approved for a new use but continues to be sold under the original NDA.
  • Type 10 – New Indication (Marketed Separately): The drug is approved for a new use and is marketed as a distinct product under the Type 10 NDA. This is often a strategic branding or exclusivity decision.

Why Classification Matters

For Regulatory Affairs professionals, these codes are not just labels; they influence the entire project roadmap:

  1. Review Expectations: Defines the level of scrutiny and the specific FDA division involved.
  2. Clinical Strategy: Determines if full-scale Phase III trials are needed or if bridge studies/bioequivalence will suffice.
  3. Timeline Management: Impacts the eligibility for priority review or other expedited programs.
  4. Exclusivity: Directly correlates with the length of marketing exclusivity and patent protection.

Mastering NDA classifications ensures that regulatory teams choose the correct submission pathway, minimizing delays and maximizing the commercial lifecycle of the product.

Need Expert Guidance?

Contact us at contact@elendilabs.com / +852 4416 5550