ElendiLabs — Regulatory consultancy platform connecting medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers with verified experts worldwide

Want real case studies? 10 seconds to sign up

Join the platform

Registration

January 25, 2026

Approximately 5 minutes

Reviewed by Nate Lam, Founder & Director, ElendiLabs

Slovakia Act No. 362/2011 §124b(6): Joint Liability of Authorized Representative for Defective Medical Devices

Paragraph 124b(6) provides: The authorized representative shall be jointly and severally liable with the manufacturer for damage caused by a medical device that is defective within the meaning of the special regulation on liability for damage caused by a defective product, if the manufacturer is not established in a Member State of the European Union. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

2. Trigger Conditions for Liability

Joint liability arises when all are met:

  • Medical device placed on Slovak market by non-EU manufacturer
  • Device qualifies as defective under Product Liability Act (transposing Directive 85/374/EEC)
  • Damage (death, personal injury, property damage > threshold) occurs
  • Authorized representative is established in Slovakia

Defect defined as lack of safety reasonably expected, considering presentation, use, marketing time. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

3. Nature of Joint and Several Liability

  • Injured person can claim full compensation from AR alone, manufacturer alone, or both
  • AR pays, then seeks recourse from manufacturer
  • Strict liability — no need to prove fault/negligence
  • Does not limit manufacturer’s primary liability

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

4. Covered Damages

Liability covers:

  • Death or personal injury
  • Damage to property (private use, above statutory threshold)
  • Economic loss directly linked to personal injury/property damage

Moral/non-pecuniary damages may be claimed under general civil rules. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

5. MDR Transition Impact

Legacy devices under MDD transitional period (MDR Article 120):

  • §124b(6) joint liability applies until MDD certificate expiry
  • Post-transition, MDR Article 10(16) continues equivalent AR joint liability for non-EU manufacturers
  • Exposure persists for devices placed before full MDR application

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

6. RA Manager Practical Considerations

  • Secure product liability insurance specifically covering AR exposure
  • Negotiate comprehensive indemnity and hold-harmless clauses in AR agreement
  • Maintain detailed conformity, risk management, and PMS records as defense
  • Implement rapid incident investigation to mitigate defect claims
  • Monitor ŠÚKL vigilance reports for early defect signals
  • Establish claim notification cascade to insurer/legal counsel/manufacturer

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

7. Typical Claim Triggers

  • Patient injury from alleged inadequate labelling/instructions
  • Device malfunction leading to serious adverse event
  • Widespread defects prompting class/collective claims
  • Recall situations where causation linked to design/manufacturing
  • Claims exceeding manufacturer’s insurance or solvency

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) practical application (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

8. RA Liability Mitigation Checklist

  • AR agreement includes full recourse/indemnity from manufacturer?
  • Product liability coverage limits sufficient for Slovak claims?
  • Technical documentation complete, current, and AR-accessible?
  • Vigilance/PMS integrated with liability risk monitoring?
  • Slovak-specific IFU/warnings reviewed for adequacy?
  • Claim intake/escalation protocol documented?
  • Historical claims/patterns tracked and analyzed?

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

9. Claim Procedure in Slovakia

  • Claims governed by Product Liability Act and Civil Code
  • Filed in Slovak courts (usually claimant’s residence)
  • ŠÚKL may provide vigilance/market surveillance evidence
  • Limitation: 3 years from awareness of damage, max 10 years from placement
  • Courts may apportion if multiple liable parties

Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

10. Alignment with MDR Liability Rules

§124b(6) mirrors MDD-era joint liability; MDR Article 10(16) retains:

  • Joint and several liability for non-EU manufacturers via AR
  • Strict liability standard
  • Consistency with EU Product Liability Directive

ARs should maintain robust risk transfer and insurance strategies. Source: Act No. 362/2011 Coll. §124b(6) (https://www.slov-lex.sk/ezbierky/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2011/362/#paragraf-124b.odsek-6)

Need Regulatory Help? Try Our Platform

Post your regulatory questions or request quotations from verified pharmaceutical consultants worldwide. Get matched with experts who specialize in your market.

Nate Lam — ElendiLabs
Pharma, med device, AI & SEO/GEO

Registered Pharmacist · AI Engineer · Director, ElendiLabs

Registered pharmacist, AI engineer, HKHAIS founder, and pharmaceutical & medical device SEO/GEO specialist.

Ask Anything

We'll follow up with you personally.

100% response rate • Reply within 7 business days

Need Expert Guidance?

Contact us at contact@elendilabs.com / +852 4416 5550