ElendiLabs Logo
Back to Articles

Local Regulatory Experts

Connect with regulatory affairs consultancies specializing in this region.

Qualtech Consulting Corporation

Taiwan, China, Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, Germany, Korea, Thailand, USA

Registration

A specialized medical device consulting firm offering a one-stop solution for complex global regulatory challenges. We offer real-time regulatory and clinical support, local representation, and QMS services across 13 markets, ensuring efficient market entry and compliance.

Registrar Corp

Hampton, Virginia (HQ), Shenzhen, China, London, United Kingdom, Paris, France, Madrid, Spain, Hyderabad, India, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tel Aviv, Israel, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Cape Town, South Africa

Registration

A global FDA compliance firm assisting businesses in the food, medical device, drug, and cosmetic industries with registration, U.S. Agent services, labeling, and regulatory software solutions.

ARQon Pte. Ltd.

Singapore (HQ), Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Switzerland, USA, Australia, New Zealand, Rwanda, India, Sri Lanka

Registration

We are a premier regulatory consultancy firm specializing in medical devices, in-vitro diagnostics (IVD), and pharmaceuticals. Founded in 2014, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services ranging from product development strategy and clinical trials to product registration and post-market surveillance. With a team of experts possessing vast experience in regulatory authorities and industry, we bridge the gap between scientific innovation and regulatory compliance, ensuring patient safety while fostering medical advancement. The company also provides unique business matching services through its ATTOPOLIS platform and training through the International Medical Device School.

EPSI GLOBAL PTE. LTD.

Singapore (HQ), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Jakarta, Indonesia, Bangkok, Thailand, Hanoi, Vietnam, Manila, Philippines, Shanghai, China

Registration

We provide end-to-end regulatory solutions covering all classes of medical devices and IVDs in major APAC markets, especially the ASEAN region (Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines) and major Northeast Asian markets (China, Korea, Japan). Services include classification, registration, local authorized representation, quality management system (QMS) implementation/auditing (ISO 13485/local GMP), and post-market surveillance. Their local presence minimizes market entry risks and time-to-market.

View More Consultancies in This Region
Registration

December 16, 2025

Approximately 5 minutes

Medical Device Classification in Malaysia: Risk-Based System and AMDD Alignment

Medical Device Classification in Malaysia: Risk-Based System and AMDD Alignment

The Medical Device Authority (MDA) in Malaysia manages the classification system for medical devices and In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) products, as established under the Medical Device Regulation 2012. This system is closely aligned with the ASEAN Medical Devices Directive (AMDD), employing a risk-based approach that determines the level of regulatory scrutiny required for market entry.

General Medical Device Risk Classification

Medical devices (excluding IVDs) are classified into five categories, ranked from lowest to highest risk:

  • Class A: Low risk (e.g., non-invasive items like bandages or surgical retractors).
  • Class B: Low to moderate risk.
  • Class C: Moderate to high risk.
  • Class D: High risk (e.g., life-sustaining or implanted devices).
  • Combination Devices: A fifth category for products that combine a medical device with a drug, biological product, or other regulated component.

Factors Determining Classification

The MDA uses a set of general principles to assign a classification, primarily based on the risk associated with the device at the point of usage. Key factors include:

  • Intended Purpose and Action: The intended use and whether the device delivers medicine or energy to the patient, or is intended to have a biological effect.
  • Contact and Invasiveness: The duration of contact with the body, and the degree of, and site of, invasiveness into the body.
  • Effects: Whether the effects are local versus systemic, and whether the device comes into contact with injured skin.
  • Design and Use: The effectiveness of risk management techniques applied during design, manufacture, and use.

IVD Device Classification

IVD devices are categorized separately but also use the four risk classes (A, B, C, D), from lowest to highest risk. The risk level for IVDs is determined by:

  • Intended Use: The diagnostic application.
  • User Expertise: The required expertise of the intended user.
  • Diagnostic Importance: The importance of the information provided by the diagnostic test.
  • Impact of Results: The potential impact of the test results on patient health (e.g., an HIV blood test is high-risk Class D, while a pregnancy test is lower-risk Class B).

Classification of Software

  • Embedded Software: Software incorporated into a medical device that drives or influences its use (e.g., image enhancement software) is classified the same as the medical device itself.
  • Standalone Software: Software that functions independently and falls within the definition of a medical device is classified on its own merits, using the same active device classification rules. Standalone software is generally considered an active device.

Need Expert Guidance?

Contact us at contact@elendilabs.com / +852 4416 5550